Opinions
have long been divided about the optimum boning frequency for couples
hoping to procreate. But science now says that Kimye's estimated 500
times a day was off by around 498. The magical equation is two times
within an hour, according to a new study.
The
study, conducted by the North Middlesex Hospital in London, debunks the
theory that men can use up all their good sperm in the first round. Not
only did researchers find that this is simply not true, but that your
second fleet of sperm is actually the most mighty, reports the Daily Mail.
Seventy-three
couples undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) were recruited for
the study. IUI is a fertility treatment where sperm is placed directly
into the womb, and usually has only a 6 percent success rate with sperm
from a male classed as sub-fertile, as were all the males in this study.
However, when researchers used a second sperm sample produced within
the hour, the success rate tripled to 20 percent. This is compared with
24 percent using in vitro fertilization (IVF,) a more expensive
fertility treatment that involves giving women drugs that cause the
production of multiple eggs before injecting each egg with a single
sperm. This finding could also be useful for couples hoping to conceive
without the help of fertility treatment.
Dr
Jackson Kirkman-Brown, a specialist in human reproductive science at
the University of Birmingham, says that the new results disprove the
conventional wisdom that men should abstain from sex before trying for a
baby. "There is a great deal of misinformation out there," he said.
"People still think that if you want to have a baby, you should save up
sperm when, in fact, not having sex is very bad for men because it
affects sperm quality. The fresher the sperm, the better its condition."
Think of it less like a fine Bordeaux and more like a fun Beaujolais
Nouveau. It's a waste to let it just sit there.
This
study stopped the potency testing at two, so we're not sure if having
sex three times an hour turns your sperm supersonic or just inefficient.
Even if it's the latter, there's no harm in, well, coming to this
conclusion from your own experiments.
No comments:
Post a Comment